Skip to main content

Solution · Review and sign-off

Security and compliance gates

Security reviews that are gates, not bottlenecks.

CVE, then Security lead, then Patched.

Who decides · Priya Nair · Security lead · critical findings, the same day

How it runs

Every change crosses the security rules before it counts. What passes moves on; what does not reaches the security lead with the evidence ready, from the scanners you already run.

A seat is a role a person and an agent hold together; the escalation matrix says who decides above each limit, seat by seat.

  1. Agent carries14:00
    Dependency audit: a vulnerable library in the auth service
  2. Agent carries14:05
    Exposure checked; the upgrade prepared and tested
  3. Rules check14:07

    SEC-R06

    critical findings need the security lead the same day

  4. Person decides15:30
    Priya approves the upgrade; the fix ships
up the escalation matrix, by rule a person decides

Your issue tracker · Security

SEC-311

Vulnerable library in the auth service

Assigned to
PNAuth service seat
Status
Needs Priya
Drawn as your tool shows it; ClrSlate adds the line that names the owner.

Illustration · Halden, a fictional company

Step by step

Who takes each step, in order.

For

  1. 01Your scannersA scanner or a dependency audit raises a finding; it becomes a request on the seat that owns the service.
  2. 02The service’s agentChecks the exposure and prepares the fix, tested.
  3. 03The agentFixes a routine finding inside policy and records it.
  4. 04Priya Nair, security leadDecides a critical finding the same day (SEC-R06), with the fix and the exposure in front of her.
  5. 05The service ownerShips the fix through the service’s review and release.

Where the decisions sit

Decision, who decides, up to where, and above that whom.

  • A critical security findingDecides: the security lead, the same dayUp to: the fix within policyAbove that: the CTO
  • A routine findingDecides: the agent, inside policyUp to: the fix within policyAbove that: the security lead
  • Access to a system or a toolDecides: the service ownerUp to: the seat’s access profileAbove that: the identity team’s lead
  • Evidence that leaves the companyDecides: the compliance leadUp to: reviewed packs onlyAbove that: the executive

How much the agent decides, to start. Within limits: routine findings are fixed by the agent inside policy. Critical findings, and anything outside the policy, ask the security lead every time.

The record it leaves. The finding, the exposure, the fix, who approved it and under which rule.

How it plugs in

No new inbox, no new tool to learn.

  • 01

    An app in your tools

    Connects to your repositories, trackers and chat as an app

  • 02

    A check, not a meeting

    Holds a decision as a check the owner clears

  • 03

    Where people already work

    Asks the owner where they already work, and carries out what was decided

Finding · auth service

A vulnerable library

rulesSEC-R06: critical findings need the security lead the same day

Waiting on Priya Nair · Security lead

Upgrade prepared and tested; exposure checked

Approve the upgradeAsk for more
A critical finding, with the fix and the exposure ready.

The tools it runs through

    We connect to the systems you run, and build the connection before the demo.

    What it uses

    Start with howyou run today.

    Bring one piece of work that breaks at the handoffs: a pull request waiting on three reviewers, an initiative spread across twelve tools, a release nobody owns. We model the seats it crosses, give one of them an agent, and follow one decision to its record.