Your coding agents and delivery tools stay. ClrSlate governs them.
Agentic executionwith enterprise discipline.
We built ClrSlate to bring the discipline enterprises already run on (owners, decision rights, reviews and evidence) to AI agents, so agents carry the coordination and people keep the decisions.
HAChannels
payments-eng
platform
releases
incidents
Invoicing service agentAgent08:41
Picked up as REQ-2214, a request, for our seat. It carries a migration, so I ran the change review.
Sofia BrandtService owner09:06
@invoicing-agent can I approve it myself?
Invoicing service agentAgent09:12
Not this one: schema changes are Ana’s to decide. She has the packet.
Waiting on Ana Okafor · Head of platform
REQ-2214 · Schema change: invoicing service
- Checks
- Tests, scans, rollback plan
- Rule
- ENG-R08
Invoicing service agent · #payments-eng
Not this one: schema changes are Ana’s to decide. She has the packet.
Waiting on Ana Okafor · Head of platform
REQ-2214 · Schema change: invoicing service
Escalation matrix
Database schema change
Service ownerabove her limit
Sofia Brandt · up to changes inside the service
Head of platformdecides · waiting
Ana Okafor · up to additive and reversible
CTO
Daniel Ruiz · up to anything above
A vacant seat is skipped to the next one up.
Why now
Agents now produce plans, code and decisions faster than any team can review them. Enterprises already run unpredictable actors at scale: people, through roles, reviews and a chain of command.That discipline has not reached agents. ClrSlate brings it to them.
A seat is a role a person and an agent hold together; the escalation matrix says who decides above each limit, seat by seat.
An agent makes one person faster.A chain of command lets a company trust agents.
Your coding agents answer “can it do the work?”. Nobody answers “who owns what it does?”. A chain of command does.
An agent on its own
Who owns it?
The invoicing service seat
Who may decide?
Ana Okafor, Head of platform
Where is the record?
DEC-0917
One person, faster. Nobody accountable.
Agents in your organization
- 1
Request
REQ-2214 arrives, from a tool or a person.
- 2
Seat
SB Invoicing service
Sofia Brandt and the service agent
Answers “Who owns it?”
- 3
Rules
Checked before it counts.
ENG-R08escalates
Up the escalation matrix
- 4
Decision
The person who holds the right decides: Ana Okafor, Head of platform.
approved, with a conditionAnswers “Who may decide?”
- 5
Carried out
Through your tools and coding agents, from whichever vendors you chose.
RepositoryIssue trackerCI/CDChat
- 6
Record
Who, what, under which rule.
DEC-0917
Answers “Where is the record?”
↺ People change the rules, from the record.
Every seat pairs a human and an agent; the agent works, the human answers.
Your coding agents know your code.Give them your organization.
The layer above the agents you already run: which seat each works in, whom it answers to, and when it must ask.
Your agents, from whichever vendors you chose
- Coding agents · one vendor
- Coding agents · another vendor
- Agents you built
Your organization, in ClrSlate
Your tools, where they are
- Issue tracker
- Repositories
- CI/CD
- Chat
- Incident tool
- CRM
REQ-3310 · payouts staging
Four parts, four seats
- Identity client and rolesLars Nilsen and agentIdentity team
- Namespace and quotaNadia Petrova and agentKubernetes platform
- Where it deploysDelivery destinationGitOps
- How it deploysPipeline environmentCI/CD
One platform,six parts.
Agents arrive without an organization around them: nobody owns what they do, nobody decides above a limit, nothing is on the record.
- OrganizeYour org chart, seats and who decides, as you run today.Organize
- WorkRequests, reviews and decisions with an owner, on the record.Work
- AgentsEvery agent in a seat, whichever vendor, through one gateway.Agents
- Platform and deliveryEnvironments, approved templates and releases as requests with an owner.Platform and delivery
- Knowledge, security and identityIdentity, access and knowledge that stay with the seat.Knowledge, security and identity
- Your stackWorks in the tools you already run.Your stack
Start with the jobthat breaks at the handoffs.
Six of the jobs teams bring first, each with who decides.
- Code review and release that keep pace with coding agentsEvery pull request to its owner; above a limit, up the escalation matrix.Who decides · Ana Okafor · Head of platform · above the service owner’s limitSee how it runs
PR, then Ana decides, then Merge.
- Environments and production changesOne request for an environment; production changes owned.Who decides · Ana Okafor · Head of platform · capacity above the standard quotaSee how it runs
Env request, then Ana decides, then Ready.
- Strategy to executionOne brief, owners named on day one, a daily roll-up.Who decides · Meera Iyer · CEO · owners and scopeSee how it runs
Brief, then Meera names owners, then Roll-up.
- Security and compliance gatesFindings become requests; critical ones reach the security lead the same day.Who decides · Priya Nair · Security lead · critical findings, the same daySee how it runs
CVE, then Security lead, then Patched.
- Your procedure, run by the agentYour runbook, run by the agent, with you at the step that decides.Who decides · Priya Nair · Security lead · the production cutoverSee how it runs
Key due, then Priya decides, then Rotated.
- Ask the record who approved it, and whyThe auditor asks; the record answers.Who decides · The compliance owner · evidence that leaves the companySee how it runs
Audit ask, then Compliance owner, then Pack.
A day with an agenton your team.
Each step is one moment: who carries it, and who decides.
A Tuesday at Halden, a fictional software company, with an agent in the invoicing service’s seat beside Sofia Brandt, through to the CTO’s Wednesday morning.
08:40Tue
HAREQ-2214Schema change: invoicing service
Payments · opened from the repository
REQ-2211Dependency upgrade: auth library
Platform
REQ-2209Release 4.12 readiness
Release
REQ-2203Incident follow-up: payouts delay
SRE
REQ-2198Access: contractor to staging
SRE
Illustration · Halden, a fictional company
Works in the toolsyou already run.
We build a working model of your organization from the tools you already run, without asking you to change how you operate.
- A pull request opens, its owner is askedRepositories
- Assign a ticket, get a review packetIssue trackers
- An alert fires, the on-call lead decidesAlerting
- Mention the seat, get a planChat
- A key account escalates, it gets an ownerCRM
- A spec is drafted, the right seats answerDocument stores
- A release is ready, its owner approvesCI pipelines
- An auditor asks, the record answersEmail
- GitHub
- GitLab
- Azure DevOps Boards
- Jira
- Linear
- GitHub Actions
- Claude Code
- GitHub Copilot
- Cursor
- PagerDuty
- Datadog
- Okta
- Microsoft Entra ID
- Microsoft Teams
- Notion
- HubSpot
- Kubernetes
- Anthropic
How it plugs in
No new inbox, no new tool to learn.
- 01Connects to your repositories, trackers and chat as an app
- 02Holds a decision as a check the owner clears
- 03Asks the owner where they already work, and carries out what was decided
The disciplineyou would otherwise chase by hand.
Owners, decision rights, reviews and evidence: each is something an engineering leader chases today. Tick one to see ClrSlate keep it.
Left to chase by hand
24of 24
Owners
Every job has an owner
Each job belongs to a seat, and each seat has a person and an agent. Nobody has to ask whose it is.
Chased by hand today6 left
HAREQ-3310 · payouts staging
Four parts, four seats
- Identity client and rolesLars Nilsen and agentIdentity team
- Namespace and quotaNadia Petrova and agentKubernetes platform
- Where it deploysDelivery destinationGitOps
- How it deploysPipeline environmentCI/CD
Two ways in:bring your stack, or start on ours.
Bring your stack
Your trackers, repositories, pipelines and coding agents stay; ClrSlate sits above them.
Your stackStart on ours
No integrations needed to begin: the same organization, with the platform’s own requests, backlogs and a board, and knowledge.
Runs on ClrSlate alone
Questionswe expect first.
All questionsIs this another AI agent platform?
No. There are plenty of ways to build an agent. ClrSlate is the layer above them: it says which seat an agent works in, whom it answers to, what it may decide and when it must ask a human. The agents themselves can be the ones you already run.
Our coding-agent platform already has roles, approvals and audit logs. What does ClrSlate add?
Those controls govern one vendor’s agent inside the pull request: who may run it, what it may touch, and a log of what it did. ClrSlate answers the question they leave open: who in your organization owns what the agent does, who decides when it is above a limit, and where the decision is on the record. It does that for every agent you run, from whichever vendors you chose, under one chain of command, and across the work that happens outside the repository: strategy, roadmap, releases, incidents, customer escalations, audits. Keep the platform; give its agent a seat.
Who is accountable when an agent does something?
The human who owns the seat. Every seat pairs a human and an agent; the agent works, the human answers. Anything an agent cannot decide goes up the chain of command, through the same escalation matrix your organization already uses. Every decision is on the record.
Start with howyou run today.
Bring one piece of work that breaks at the handoffs: a pull request waiting on three reviewers, an initiative spread across twelve tools, a release nobody owns. We model the seats it crosses, give one of them an agent, and follow one decision to its record.
Agents carry the coordination. People keep the decisions.
“I wanted agents to join my company the way everything else does: owned, governed and accountable. That is what we built, and we run ClrSlate on ClrSlate.”